Re: [PATCH][2.6] i386 /proc/irq/.../smp_affinity

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> This backs out the variable-length cpu bitmask handling.
>> I appear to be printing out 16-bit chunks of all this in what appears
>> to be the reverse of the order expected. Why not just reverse the order
>> of the 16-bit chunks?

On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:07:58PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Indeed it does, i was thinking about supported systems and the lack of 
> NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG ia32 boxen.

I'm sitting on one, I just don't have the power to configure it that way
on any kind of regular basis. I'm going to bet the input version has
this issue also.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/