Re: [RFC] add kobject to struct module

[Rusty Russell]

In message <20030911062649.GA10454@xxxxxxxxx> you write:
> On a site note, can't you just use a "struct completion" to use for your
> waiting?  Or do you need to do something special here?

Hmm, *good* question.  Think...

Ah, it's because when someone's waiting for the reference count to hit
zero, we wake them *every* time we decrement.  With the reference
count spread across every cpu, it's the only way:

 static inline void module_put(struct module *module)
 {
 	if (module) {
 		unsigned int cpu = get_cpu();
 		local_dec(&module->ref[cpu].count);
 		/* Maybe they're waiting for us to drop reference? */
 		if (unlikely(!module_is_live(module)))
 			wake_up_process(module->waiter);
 		put_cpu();
 	}
 }

This doesn't really fit with a completion, unfortunately.

> > 1) Adopt a faster, smaller implementation of alloc_percpu (this patch
> >    exists, needs some arch-dependent love for ia64).
> > 2) Use it to generalize the current module reference count scheme to
> >    a "bigref_t" (I have a couple of these)
> > 3) Use that in kobjects.
> 
> Hm, I don't know if kobjects really need to get that heavy.

I'm not sure either: really depends on kobject usage.  I was thinking
struct netdevice.  The size for UP is the same, the size for SMP is
ptr + sizeof(int) + sizeof(atomic_t)*NR_CPUs.

> But yes, that's all 2.7 dreams :)

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/