Re: Virtual alias cache coherency results (was: x86, ARM, PARISC,PPC, MIPS and Sparc folks please run this)

[Guennadi Liakhovetski]

Hello


On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Russell King wrote:

> Tests need to be run on a larger proportion of the following:
>
> *	ARM720
> 	ARM920
> 	ARM922
> 	ARM925
> 	ARM926
> 	ARM1020
> 	ARM1022
> 	ARM1026
> *	StrongARM-110	(DEC/Intel)
> 	StrongARM-1100	(DEC/Intel)
> *	StrongARM-1110	(Intel)
> *	Xscale		(Intel)
> 	PXA		(Intel)
>
> And so far, there are only results for 4 of these devices, with some
> revisions of StrongARM-110's passing and others failing.

If I got it right, you are saying, that you only have results for the
CPUs, marked with stars in the above list. Then, I'll _repeat_ what I've
sent to the thread:

<quote>

Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 21:09:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski
Reply-To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
To: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jamie Lokier <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
     Paul J.Y. Lahaie <pjlahaie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: x86, ARM, PARISC, PPC, MIPS and Sparc folks please run this

On

Processor       : Intel XScale-PXA250 rev 3 (v5l)
BogoMIPS        : 397.31
Features        : swp half thumb fastmult edsp
CPU implementor : 0x69
CPU architecture: 5TE
CPU variant     : 0x0
CPU part        : 0x290
CPU revision    : 3
Cache type      : undefined 5
Cache clean     : undefined 5
Cache lockdown  : undefined 5
Cache unified   : Harvard
I size          : 32768
I assoc         : 32
I line length   : 32
I sets          : 32
D size          : 32768
D assoc         : 32
D line length   : 32
D sets          : 32

and

Processor       : StrongARM-1100 rev 9 (v4l)
BogoMIPS        : 127.38
Features        : swp half 26bit fastmult

version 3 of the test consistently reports "Too slow".

</quote>

Both with 2.4.19-rmk7 (pxa with -pxa1) kernels. SA is a Shannon, PXA is a
Triton.

Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/