Re: [PATCH] 2.6 workaround for Athlon/Opteron prefetch errata

From: bill davidsen
Date: Thu Sep 11 2003 - 15:06:32 EST


In article <3F6087FC.7090508@xxxxxxxxx>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| Andi Kleen wrote:
| > It was not created for that (I know that because I created it ;-)
|
| hehe
|
|
| > X86_GENERIC is merely an optimization hint (currently it only changes the cache
| > line size hint) It does not change anything related to correctness. Everything
| > that handles correctness is checked unconditionally.
|
| When, building non-Pentium4-related code when CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 &&
| !CONFIG_X86_GENERIC, it's OK that the code is incorrect for (picking
| example) AMD processors.
|
| It would be a user bug to boot that on an AMD box, just like it would be
| user bug to boot a CONFIG_M586 kernel on an ancient 386.
|
|
| > is_prefetch is a correctness thing.
|
| When we know at compile time it's not needed, it should not be enabled.

Clearly that's right. This buys nothing on CPUs which don't have the
problem, why have *any* overhead in size and speed? It's too bad that
people have to read around all that code, they don't need to give it a
home in their RAM and execute it as well.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/