Re: [PATCH] deal with lack of acpi prt entries gracefully

[Jesse Barnes]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:00:30PM +0100, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> > None of the above.  We have our own NUMAlink based interrupt protocol
> > model.
> 
> Oooer! Hmm, the existing code would probably NOT like having _PRT entries for 
> a model it doesn't know about.... you could add support for it fairly easily 
> though I suppose...

Yeah, that's what Andy suggested too.  I guess I have to use one of the
reserved fields and try to get the ACPI spec updated.

Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/