Re: [Bluez-devel] Re: [BUG] BlueTooth socket busted in 2.6.0-test5

[David Woodhouse]

On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 06:21 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Er, if we're actually _running_ code from the bnep module, how can it
> have a zero refcount? This bug is elsewhere, surely?

Please confirm this fixes it...

===== net/bluetooth/bnep/sock.c 1.11 vs edited =====
--- 1.11/net/bluetooth/bnep/sock.c	Thu Jun  5 01:57:08 2003
+++ edited/net/bluetooth/bnep/sock.c	Fri Sep 12 09:16:17 2003
@@ -186,7 +189,8 @@
 
 static struct net_proto_family bnep_sock_family_ops = {
 	.family = PF_BLUETOOTH,
-	.create = bnep_sock_create
+	.create = bnep_sock_create,
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE
 };
 
 int __init bnep_sock_init(void)


-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/