Re: [2.4.22-rc1] ext3/jbd assertion failure transaction.c:1164

[Marcelo Tosatti]

On 28 Aug 2003, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 14:57, Pascal Schmidt wrote:
> 
> > > Many thanks --- I was able to reproduce this very easily, and I know of
> > > one or two very unusual things that fsx does which might well be the
> > > trigger here.  I'll let you know how things go.
> > 
> > Good, at least it's not a bug that only happens here and is hard to
> > reproduce elsewhere.
> > 
> > I hope this does not happen under normal fs usage. ;)
> 
> It's all down to ext3_writepage() using data-journaling rather than
> metadata journaling.  
> 
> The obvious fix is just to make the journal_dirty_async_data() code
> commit its writes as metadata if the inode is marked for
> data-journaling, and to set the transaction handle to be synchronous in
> that case.  Sounds like a recipe for deadlock if done incorrectly,
> though, so I'll give it a more careful look tomorrow.

Hello Stephen, 

Whats the status of this? 

You told me the other day you knew how to fix but needed some more 
thoughs...

Thanks 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/