Re: Can we kill f inb_p, outb_p and other random I/O on port 0x80, in 2.6?

From: Jamie Lokier
Date: Mon Sep 22 2003 - 16:55:50 EST


linux@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> > So can we gradually kill inb_p, outb_p in 2.6? An the other
> > miscellaneous users of I/O port 0x80 for I/O delays?
>
> Actually, It's not easy. The issue got debated a lot a few years ago.
> A read is also acceptable, and allows a few more ports to be
> potentially used, but that corrupts %al and thus bloats the code.

It bloats the code a lot less than udelay() calls or any other
solution which keeps the delay!

In the worst case, the bloat from a read _should_ be two bytes: "push
%eax; inb $80,%al; pop %eax". Whereas a call to udelay is 5 bytes,
for a call instruction.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/