Re: 2.6.0-test5-mm4: wanxl doesn't compile with gcc 2.95

[Krzysztof Halasa]

Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> > +		       " at 0x%LX!\n", card_name(pdev), (u64)addr);
> 
> This should be "unsigned long long", not u64.  That is what "%L" means,
> after all.

Right. I was under an impression they're the same.

I assume you don't want (me to post) a corrected patch, do you?

Thanks.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/