Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6

[Olivier Galibert]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:08:55AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:39:33 +0100
> David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 99% or more of tristate options can be enabled without affecting the
> > kernel, and it is expected that such options can be set to 'm' later,
> > while the kernel in question is actually running, then built and loaded
> > without a reboot.
> 
> Expected by whom?  Not by me.

By me for instance.  I'm used to modules having no influence until
loaded, even at compilation time.  I'm used to in-tree and out-of-tree
modules to have exactly the same status (ignoring the binary-only
modules crap).


> > We should strive to keep this true.
> 
> For things _OUTSIDE_ the kernel, surely.  But inside the kernel
> tree I don't see any value in this new restriction.
> 
> > 	Allow this kernel to ever support IPv6? Y/N
> > 	Build IPv6 support? Y/M/N
> 
> And I still think this is a complete joke.

I suspect what you _really_ want is a "disable ipv6 entirely"
depending on CONFIG_EMBEDDED which would remove the then bloat.
Normal users would never see it and the meaning would be obvious for
the ones who care.

  OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/