Re: Linux 2.6.0-test6 (compile statistics)

[John Cherry]

On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:44, Jesper Juhl wrote:
[snip]
> 
> I was wondering if there would be any point in doing these builds with
> "allnoconfig" as well?
> Could this possibly flush out some warnings/errors that only occur when
> something is left out?
> 
> 

The compile regressions now build with allnoconfig as well for both
Linus' tree and Andrew's tree.  Check out...

http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/

BTW, the latest compile stats for test6-mm3 and test6-mm4 are:

Kernel version: 2.6.0-test6-mm4
Kernel build: 
   Making bzImage (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors
   Making modules (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors
   Making bzImage (allnoconfig): 1 warnings, 0 errors
   Making bzImage (allyesconfig): 179 warnings, 1 errors
   Making modules (allyesconfig): 9 warnings, 0 errors
   Making bzImage (allmodconfig): 3 warnings, 0 errors
   Making modules (allmodconfig): 234 warnings, 1 errors

Kernel version: 2.6.0-test6-mm3
Kernel build: 
   Making bzImage (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors
   Making modules (defconfig): 0 warnings, 0 errors
   Making bzImage (allnoconfig): 1 warnings, 0 errors
   Making bzImage (allyesconfig): 178 warnings, 1 errors
   Making modules (allyesconfig): 9 warnings, 0 errors
   Making bzImage (allmodconfig): 3 warnings, 0 errors
   Making modules (allmodconfig): 252 warnings, 1 errors


John

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/