Re: Can't X be elemenated?

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> >>different toolkits exist becouse people are solving different problems.
> >>which set of people do you propose telling that their desires don't
> >>matter?
> >
> >
> >Well, qt and gtk solve pretty much same problem,
> >their existence seems like historical accident to me.
> 
> Hmm. World (also in linux kernel) is not so efficient!
> There are more tools for same task/problem. Maybe in the long run only one 
> tools per problem will survive, but the diversity is good, also at cost of 
> the duplicate work.

It is not where you have competing interfaces.

> Do you want only one distribution for user, one for small companies, one 
> for schools,...? Do you want only one web server implementation? Only one 
> filesystem per task (only one journaling FS)?
> Are they all "historical accident"?

Well, I'm pretty glad there's only one glibc, and only one http
protocol, and only one X protocol. And it would be way better if there
was just one toolkit commonly used on Linux.
								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/