Re: freed_symbols [Re: People, not GPL [was: Re: Driver Model]]

[Larry McVoy]

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:40:37AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> This is not about whether a licence _can_ demand this. We know it can --
> it can demand the ritual sacrifice of your first-born, and all that
> means is that if you don't agree, you don't get to use the software in
> question??.

No, that's the point you have been missing all along.  Any unenforceable 
clause is null and void.  Read section 7 of the GPL and a little law.
You can't enforce unenforceable clauses by revoking the license.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy              lm at bitmover.com          http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/