Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model

[viro]

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:31:55PM -0700, retu wrote:
> Now here's the competition:
> 
> System 
[snip the revolting offense against Occam's Razor]
> System.Xml.Xsl 
> 
> These are massive and can't be built in a day. But
> with a very decent component model and design
> philosphy on what to put in and what not it would
> enable people to quickly fill in the blanks (plus
> maybe some rapid abstracting/wrapping) which would do
> a very lot for the OS.  

Please, take your cargo-cult education somewhere else.  You are yet to
show that you understand what does "component model" mean, let alone
to demonstrate that you are capable of discussing benefits of such
beasts.  "It had been mentioned in lecture notes" doesn't cut it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/