Re: OK to set PF_MEMDIE on cleanup tasks?

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Thu Oct 16 2003 - 19:15:47 EST


Hello, Andrew,

On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 05:12:27PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > So... Is it considered legit to simply set PF_MEMDIE when creating
> > the cleanup task? Or is there some reason that one should deal with
> > signal 15?
>
> Well it's all very unconventional. Catching SIGTERM seems like a suitable
> way to do what you want to do.

OK, since this particular case is a strictly in-kernel task, SIGTERM
should be a no-op anyway. Unless I am missing something in the signal
delivery code, which is quite probable. ;-)

So the magic code would then be:

cap_raise(current->cap_effective, CAP_SYS_RAWIO);

perhaps with:

cap_raise(current->cap_effective, CAP_SYS_ADMIN);

thrown in for good measure.

> Possibly your special process should also run as PF_MEMALLOC. I've seen
> that done before, with success. There is no existing API with which this
> can be set.

This would certainly head off at least some OOM deadlock situations.
On the (perhaps unlikely) chance that this was an invitation, here
is a patch to create an API.

Thanx, Paul

diff -urN -X /home/linux/2.5/dontdiff linux-2.6.0-test7-mm1/include/linux/sched.h linux-2.6.0-test7-mm1-PF_MEMALLOC/include/linux/sched.h
--- linux-2.6.0-test7-mm1/include/linux/sched.h 2003-10-16 07:16:05.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.0-test7-mm1-PF_MEMALLOC/include/linux/sched.h 2003-10-16 09:20:34.000000000 -0700
@@ -508,6 +508,27 @@
#define PF_LESS_THROTTLE 0x00100000 /* Throttle me less: I clean memory */
#define PF_SYNCWRITE 0x00200000 /* I am doing a sync write */

+/**
+ * mark_task_memalloc - mark the specified task as deserving of preferential
+ * access to free memory. Note that with great power comes great
+ * responsibility.
+ * @p: the task structure to be granted preferential access.
+ */
+static inline void mark_task_memalloc(task_t *p)
+{
+ p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
+}
+
+/**
+ * unmark_task_memalloc - mark the specified task as no longer deserving
+ * of preferential access to free memory.
+ * @p: the task structure to have its preferential access revoked.
+ */
+static inline void unmark_task_memalloc(task_t *p)
+{
+ p->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
extern int set_cpus_allowed(task_t *p, cpumask_t new_mask);
#else
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/