Re: Transparent compression in the FS

From: Eric Sandall
Date: Thu Oct 16 2003 - 20:48:10 EST


Quoting jlnance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> But at the same time we rely on TCP/IP which uses a hash (checksum)
> to detect back packets. It seems to work well in practice even
> though the hash is weak and the network corrupts a lot of packets.
>
> Lots of machines dont have ECC ram and seem to work reasonably well.
>
> It seems like these two are a lot more likely to bit you than hash
> collisions in MD5. But Ill have to go read the paper to see what
> Im missing.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim

It doesn't really matter that the hash collision is /less/ likely to ruin data
than something in hardware as it adds an /extra/ layer of possible corruption,
so you have a net gain in the possible corruption of your data. Now, if you
could write it so that there was /no/ possibility of data corruption, than it
would be much more acceptable as it wouldn't add any extra likeliness of
corruption than already exists.

-sandalle

--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric@xxxxxxxxxx | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/