Re: Transparent compression in the FS

From: Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
Date: Fri Oct 17 2003 - 03:16:41 EST


Jeff Garzik wrote:
Val Henson wrote:
of many kinds of hardware errors. Further analysis shows that this
approach is not as risk-free as it seems at first glance."


I'm curious if anyone has done any work on using multiple different checksums? For example, the cost of checksumming a single block with multiple algorithms (sha1+md5+crc32 for a crazy example), and storing

With sha1 you probably have 8-9 nines reliability.
You can improve this - but still adding nines doesn't mean it (reliability) becomes 100%.

my 0.02c.

--
Ihar 'Philips' Filipau / with best regards from Saarbruecken.
--
"... and for $64000 question, could you get yourself vaguely
familiar with the notion of on-topic posting?"
-- Al Viro @ LKML

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/