Re: reproduceable oops in -test8

From: William Lee Irwin III
Date: Sun Oct 19 2003 - 14:15:03 EST


El Sat, 18 Oct 2003 18:19:49 -0700 William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribi?:
>> Two stupid bugs in my case. With a bit of noise surrounding things
>> (e.g. EXPORT_SYMBOL() crud, init_task paranoia garbage, ->f_pos in
>> unsigned long removal), un-reversing the arguments to find_pid()
>> and not blowing away the last-seen tid while formatting it and later
>> trying to use it as ->f_pos are the needed fixes.

On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 04:59:14PM +0200, Diego Calleja Garc?a wrote:
> This fixes the oops in wli1, thanks; now it reproduces the same behaviour
> of vanilla -test8

You say the behavior of vanilla 2.6.0-test8 was the machine and/or process
getting hung? And this is still happening even after the fixes?

Thing is, it's working perfectly here, though I don't have a decent way
to use totem. Could you send the results of sysrq t when it "hangs"?


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/