Re: 2.6.0-test8-mm1

[Thomas Giese]

this 2.6.0-mm1 is really very good,

but i would VERY enjoy to have the cloop-device from knopper in it!
we have the cryptloop, why not the very good cloop?

this would be a wonderful combination?

best Regards

Thomas Giese

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
Von: "James Simmons" <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
An: "Thomas Schlichter" <schlicht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Helge Hafting" <helgehaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Andrew Morton"
<akpm@xxxxxxxx>; <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx>; <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 22:42
Betreff: Re: 2.6.0-test8-mm1


>
> > > This patch was fine.  2.6.0-test8 with this patch booted and
> > > looked no different from plain 2.6.0-test8.  I am using it for
> > > writing this.  The problems must be in mm1 somehow.
> > >
> > > Helge Hafting
>
> Yeah!!!
>
> > Well here I've got same problems for -test8 + fbdev-patch as
with -test8-mm1.
> > I've compiled the kernel with most DEBUG_* options enabled (all but
> > DEBUG_INFO and KGDB) and see the same cursor and image corruption as
with
> > -mm1 and the same options enabled.
> >
> > Should I try compiling this kernel without the DEBUG_* options and watch
if I
> > get the invalidate_list Oops again?
>
> Yes. I'm using vesafb and I have no problems. I liek to see what the
> problem really is.
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/