Re: [BUG somewhere] 2.6.0-test8 irq.c, IRQ_INPROGRESS ?

[Marcelo Tosatti]

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> 
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, M.H.VanLeeuwen wrote:
> > 
> > I'm seeing an NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP go away when I revert this patch
> > previously added into test8.
> 
> Yes, the thing is buggy. 
> 
> It's not correct for "disable_irq_nosync()" users, and reverting it is the 
> right thing to do. Thanks for the report.
> 
> Marcelo, please note if you played with this in 2.4.x..

2.4.23-pre8 does clear IRQ_INPROGRESS in setup_IRQ() (it fixes the IDE setup
hang viro mentioned). 

disable_irq_nosync() doesnt care about IRQ_INPROGRESS. I cant figure out why 
does the change breaks...
 




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/