Re: [AMD64 1/3] fix C99-style declarations

[John Levon]

On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 10:56:17PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:

> I don't think it makes much difference. People hacking on one architecture
> break other architectures all the time for various reasons, e.g.
> the implicit includes in different architectures vary widely.

An unusual argument ...

> The few people left who use 2.95 will just have to live with

I am a little dubious it's "few people". (especially as gcc 2.96 has the
same problem).

regards,
john

-- 
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/