Re: [AMD64 1/3] fix C99-style declarations

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > This has happened more than once in the tree.
> > 
> > When all the architectures have a minimum gcc requirement that accepts
> > mixed code and declarations by default, it can be removed ...
> 
> Would be my prefered solution. Discourage 2.95.
> 
> Sooner or later we have to do that anyways when a bug in 2.95 
> is found that breaks code (has happened with all gccs so far). 
> Sooner would be better, as supporting 2.95 seems to be already
> a significant mainteance burden.

Well.. except that 2.95 is still two times faster than gcc 3.3 :-(.

								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/