Re: Processes receive SIGSEGV if TCQ is enabled

[Ivan Gyurdiev]

Hi, perhaps this might also be relevant:

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0307.2/1655.html

Have those issues here been finally addressed?
I haven't been following development much lately, but I wanted to ask, 
since at the moment I have no confidence in TCQ. I know #1 has been 
fixed. Have there been any major TCQ changes that I need to retest for?

The only thing I see is this:

ChangeSet@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2003-09-05 07:15:37-07:00, 
B.Zolnierkiewicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  [PATCH] ide: fix ide_cs oops with TCQ

Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> Hello again...
>
> On Thursday 30 October 2003 22:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Thomas Schlichter <schlicht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > today I tried to test TCQ with the linux-2.6.0-test9-mm1 kernel. The
> > > config.gz is attached. But after enabling TCQ with 'hdparm -Q1 /dev/hda'
> > > newly started processes die due to a received SIGSEGV. No bad kernel
> > > messages appear...


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/