Re: ext3 performance inconsistencies, 2.4/2.6
From: Paul Venezia
Date: Tue Nov 04 2003 - 16:08:50 EST
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 15:30, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> > Unless bonnie++ is using the _unlocked() variants, it might be an issue of
> > the mutex overhead from NPTL v. LinuxThreads. Red Hat 9 has its share
> > of NPTL bugs.
> Hmm.. That would easily explain the differences, since NPTL will trigger
> both on 2.6.0 and the RH-2.4 kernel, but not on the standard 2.4.22
> But there really should be zero contention on the stdio data structures,
> so the locking would have to be _seriously_ broken to make that kind o
> fdifference (not necessarily buggy, but seriously badly implemented).
> A non-contended lock should be at most one locked instruction if well
> done, both on LinuxThreads and NPTL.
A truncated strace under 2.4.22 is here:
It's incomplete, but shows the putc calls.
> > It is probably worth rerunning the tests with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 on
> > the Red Hat kernel.
> That would be interesting.
Tests are running now. Updates as events warrant.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/