Re: Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right
From: Ingo Oeser
Date: Wed Nov 05 2003 - 08:53:02 EST
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 09:13, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Timothy Miller wrote:
> > Nikita Danilov wrote:
> >> It is called "a directory". :) There is no crime in putting
> >> cc src/*.c
> >> into Makefile. I think that Hans' query-result-object denoting multiple
> >> objects is more like directory than single regular file.
> > So a file system query that results in multiple files generates a
> > "virtual directory"?
> Remember that this code does not exist yet.....;-)
> Sounds like it might be a good way to do it though.
Yes and this also solves the "refine feedback" problem: Just return
sth. useful in the stat->nlink for that directory
or even create a new stat-like syscall.
Now the issuer can decide on ANY level, whether to refine the search or
accept the result to present it in a listing.
A proper replacement for nlink is looong overdue.
But even with the crappy one, we have now, it can be decided since a
list of 65K is too much for a proper selection and cannot be handled by
a user. Somebody even said that every search pattern revealing more
than 50 records is not refined enough.
PS: Hans, we just saved you the funding on this topic.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/