Re: [PATCH] SMP signal latency fix up.
From: Mark Gross
Date: Thu Nov 06 2003 - 18:37:53 EST
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 15:26, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Mark Gross wrote:
> > diff -urN -X dontdiff linux-2.6.0-test9/kernel/sched.c /opt/linux-2.6.0-test9/kernel/sched.c
> > --- linux-2.6.0-test9/kernel/sched.c 2003-10-25 11:44:29.000000000 -0700
> > +++ /opt/linux-2.6.0-test9/kernel/sched.c 2003-11-06 13:04:03.628116240 -0800
> > @@ -626,13 +626,13 @@
> > }
> > success = 1;
> > }
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > - else
> > - if (unlikely(kick) && task_running(rq, p) && (task_cpu(p) != smp_processor_id()))
> > - smp_send_reschedule(task_cpu(p));
> > -#endif
> > p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
> > }
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > + else
> > + if (unlikely(kick) && task_running(rq, p) && (task_cpu(p) != smp_processor_id()))
> > + smp_send_reschedule(task_cpu(p));
> > +#endif
> > task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
> Without any comment as to whether or not the patch would work, shouldn't
> the "else" be moved back by a tab?
You are correct.
The source file used ot build the patch "looked" correct but had some
spaces where intermixed, that didn't show up until the tabs got expanded
by the cut and paste into the mailer.
I can re-send if you like, but I have a feeling Linux and Ingo are going
to work something slightly different out. So I'll hold off.
Sorry about that.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/