Re: [PATCH] 2.4.21-rc1: byteorder.h breaks with __STRICT_ANSI__defined (trivial)
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu Nov 06 2003 - 18:42:44 EST
Followup to: <20031106143110.6231ecde.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
By author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> On 6 Nov 2003 12:40:55 -0800
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Note that "long long" (the underlying type) is valid
> > standards-compliant C99. gcc can handle it when in C89 mode if
> > defined as __extension__ long long IIRC.
> That's correct and I've suggested this.
> But keep in mind that people with non-GCC compilers will then
> start complaining.
# define __gcc_extension __extension__
# define __gcc_extension
typedef __gcc_extension signed long long s32;
typedef __gcc_extension unsigned long long u32;
<hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> at work, <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> in private!
If you send me mail in HTML format I will assume it's spam.
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/