From: Bradley Bozarth
Date: Fri Nov 07 2003 - 20:04:08 EST

Daniel Quinlan originally maintained this, now it is orphaned. His endian
patch, which implemented the correct behavior according to the docs (which
basically listed always do little endian as a todo), was dropped.

We have been maintaining this patch on our kernel, but it really should go
in - I don't want to spend a ton of time like I did last time to have it
dropped again, however - is anyone thinking of maintaining cramfs? What
are the chances of the endian fix going in if I submit it again? (if even
the former maintainer had no success). I would maintain cramfs if desired
- it hasn't really changed in a long time except in regards to higher
level fs changes.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at