Re: [PATCH] Fix find busiest queue 2.6.0-test9

[Davide Libenzi]

On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Martin J. Bligh wrote:

> I ran it on the 16-way - no difference in performance. If the code is 
> correct as was before (and I agree, it seems it was), perhaps it's just
> in need of a big fat comment to explain the confusion? ;-)

Ingo already dropped a fat comment ;) This is the relevant part:

 * We fend off statistical fluctuations in runqueue lengths by
 * saving the runqueue length during the previous load-balancing
 * operation and using the smaller one the current and saved lengths.
 


- Davide



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/