Re: [PATCH] seq_file version of /proc/interrupts

[Erik Jacobson]

Hi there.  I'm sorry it took me so long to test this.  I was able to
get some time on our 512p system this morning.  I ran the test and your
fix does solve this problem.

Actually, it was 511 processors at the time.

I was going to include the output but I decied most people wouldn't want
to stretch their windows that wide.  The output isn't pretty on a system
with this many processors - but it isn't breaking and that is the main
concern.

Thanks again for checking in to this.  Much appreciated.

Erik

> > Here, anyway, is a better version of the patch.  It's less intrusive,
> > forgoes some "cleanups" I indulged in the first time, and makes it easier
> > to update other architectures.  I did x86-64, ia_64 and ppc64 just for the
> > heck of it, but I can't test them.
>
> I tested your changes on a small ia64 Altix here.  It worked well.  I'll try
> it out on a 512p system when I can get a time slot on it.
>
> Thanks for doing this.
>
> Erik
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

--
Erik Jacobson - Linux System Software - Silicon Graphics - Eagan, Minnesota
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/