Re: [PATCH][2.6-mm] __kunmap/oprofile final link failure

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sun Nov 23 2003 - 17:21:53 EST


Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x927): In function `__switch_to':
> arch/i386/kernel/process.c:564: undefined reference to
> `__kunmap_atomic_type'
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x92e):arch/i386/kernel/process.c:565:
> undefined reference to `__kunmap_atomic_type'
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x939):arch/i386/kernel/process.c:566:
> undefined reference to `__kmap_atomic'
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x944):arch/i386/kernel/process.c:567:
> undefined reference to `__kmap_atomic'
> arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x94e):arch/i386/kernel/process.c:572:
> undefined reference to `__kmap_atomic_vaddr'
> arch/i386/oprofile/built-in.o(.text+0x171a): In function
> `oprofile_reset_stats':
> include/asm/bitops.h:251: undefined reference to `cpu_possible_map'
> arch/i386/oprofile/built-in.o(.text+0x179e): In function
> `oprofile_create_stats_files':
> include/asm/bitops.h:251: undefined reference to `cpu_possible_map'
>
> Test compiled with NR_CPUS = 4, 64 and !CONFIG_SMP on i386

OK, there's just way too much compile breakage from the cpu_possible()
changes. I'll drop them - something which does less reorganisation in the
headers is needed.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/