Re: [RFC] generalise scheduling classes

[bill davidsen]

In article <3FC0A0C2.90800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Nick Piggin  <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| We still don't have an HT aware scheduler, which is unfortunate because
| weird stuff like that looks like it will only become more common in future.

The idea is hardly new, in the late 60's GE (still a mainframe vendor at
that time) was looking at two execution units on a single memory path.
They decided it would have problems with memory bandwidth, what else is
new?


-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/