Re: What exactly are the issues with 2.6.0-test10 preempt?

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Tue Nov 25 2003 - 11:21:15 EST

Next message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: hard links create local DoS vulnerability and security problems"
Previous message: Matt Bernstein: "2.6: can't lockf() over NFS"
In reply to: Guennadi Liakhovetski: "Re: What exactly are the issues with 2.6.0-test10 preempt?"
Next in thread: Matthias Urlichs: "Re: What exactly are the issues with 2.6.0-test10 preempt?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> SORRY. Please, inore this report. It IS 100% reproducable - if you load
> wrong (compiled without debugging) modules...

Heh.

If only all bug-reports were of that kind ;)

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: hard links create local DoS vulnerability and security problems"
Previous message: Matt Bernstein: "2.6: can't lockf() over NFS"
In reply to: Guennadi Liakhovetski: "Re: What exactly are the issues with 2.6.0-test10 preempt?"
Next in thread: Matthias Urlichs: "Re: What exactly are the issues with 2.6.0-test10 preempt?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]