Re: [Patch 3/5] dm: make v4 of the ioctl interface the default

From: Alasdair G Kergon
Date: Tue Nov 25 2003 - 15:19:47 EST


On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 06:29:49PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> 'last few months' is extremely short for a migration path. Can't we
> ditch the v1 interface in 2.7 and allow people to migrate slowly?

People still using LVM2/device-mapper userspace components that
don't support v4 really should upgrade them to fix some significant
(unrelated) issues with those old versions.

The v1 interface was broken.
(Not architecture independent. And used __kernel_dev_t.)

The v4 interface fixed things, and is the only version anyone
compiling a new kernel should be using.

The v4 interface has been supported officially since mid-July in
device-mapper 1.0 (with LVM 2.0).

Since then, the userspace component that communicates with device-mapper
(libdevmapper.so) has supported *both* versions simultaneously - so you
don't need to change anything in userspace when switching between
kernels running v1 and v4. (The LVM2 tools talk to libdevmapper.so
which detects and handles the interface version transparently.)

In the current device-mapper tarball that I put on the Sistina FTP site
last Friday v1 support is no longer available by default - it has to be
specifically requested as a configuration option.

Alasdair
--
agk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/