Re: amanda vs 2.6

[Gene Heskett]

On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:55, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:16, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>On Thursday 27 November 2003 08:39, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>>>On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 05:05:50AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>> My $0.02, but performance like that would scare a new user right
>>>> back to winderz.
>>>> Around here, its thanksgiving day, and we traditionally eat way
>>>> too much turkey (or something like that :)  And then complain
>>>> about the weight we've gained of course...
>>>
>>>This isn't a performance problem. This is a bug. It vaguely sounds
>>> like a missed wakeup or missing setting of TIF_NEED_RESCHED, but
>>> could be a number of other things too.
>>>
>>>(The missing setting of TIF_NEED_RESCHED theory is right if it's
>>>possible to clean up after it by ignoring need_resched() in the
>>>scheduler and always rescheduling.)
>>
>>Well, running 2.6.0-test11, I just discovered I'm back to being
>> unable to 'su amanda' again.  It worked the first time, but I got
>> rejected frorm unpacking the lastest
>> amanda-2.4.4p1-20031126.tar.gz due to a lack of permissions, so I
>> exited, chowned the archive to what it was supposed to be, but
>> cannot now do another su amanda in order to start the install of
>> this latest snapshot.
>>
>>The process just [root@coyote root]# ps -ea |grep su
26658 pts/1    00:00:00 su
[root@coyote root]# cat /proc/26658/wchan
sys_wait4[root@coyote root]#
hangs, never comeing back to a prompt.  I never
>> had any troubles with that useing test9, so I guess its reboot
>> time again.
>>
>>However, IMO this is a major problem, and needs fixed before 2.6.0.
>
>Rebooted to 2.6.0-test10, deadline scheduler now, and have managed
> to do an 'su amanda' at least twice without any hangs.
>
>Three times now, no problems.  4 times, exited the last one with a
>ctrl-d instead of an exit string, and now the 5th time is hung.  Is
>ctrl-d no longer a valid shell exit option?  Finding the su PID, and
>catting /proc/PID/wchan returns this just as it did yesterday:
>
>[root@coyote root]# ps -ea |grep su
>26658 pts/1    00:00:00 su
>[root@coyote root]# cat /proc/26658/wchan
>sys_wait4[root@coyote root]#

Then I killed that su process, which got me back my prompt in that 
shell.  I have since done 4 runs of 'su amanda -c "amcheck 
DailySet1"' without any problem.  Now can I just plain 'su amanda'?

No, thats hung again.  Somebody wanna pass me the excedrin, I've got 
headache #947...

>Comment on schedulers, deadline seems to leave me with the snappiest
>machine response, with cfq a close second.  The default anticipatory
>just doesn't have the right 'feel' to it.
>
>Also, setiathome only did 3 units yesterday, and it normally does 4
> to 5.  With the overcommit_memory non-zeroed, the machine was an
> arthritic, stuttering as it barked, spastic dog.
>
>Or, any cat could have caught that mouse...

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/