Re: hash table sizes

From: Jörn Engel
Date: Fri Nov 28 2003 - 16:19:56 EST


[pruned CC: list]

On Fri, 28 November 2003 13:35:36 -0600, Jack Steiner wrote:
>
> Then I still dont understand your proposal. (I probably missed some piece
> of the discussion).
>
> You proposed above to limit the allocation to the amount of memory on a node.

Jes didn't _limit_ the allocation to the memory on a node, he _based_
it on it, instead of total memory for all nodes. Therefore a 1024
node NUMA machine with 2GB per node has no bigger hash tables, than a
single CPU machine with 2GB total memory, however big that may be.

Unless I didn't understand his patch, that is. :)

Jörn

--
"Error protection by error detection and correction."
-- from a university class
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/