Re: Linux 2.4 future
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Tue Dec 02 2003 - 15:34:56 EST
Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:09:04PM +0100, Stephan von Krawczynski escreveu:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:03:15 -0200
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:54:36PM +0100, Ionut Georgescu escreveu:
> > > I can only second that. We've been using XFS here since the days of
> > > 2.4.0-testxx and the only problems we've had were sitting between the
> > > chair and the keyboard.
> > So if there is no problems at all using it as a patch why add this to a
> > kernel that is phasing out?
> Because it is _not_.
So what? You disagree, what is the problem of keeping a patch out of the tree
if the tree is getting in deep freeze?
> I really wonder how many of you have read this list up to 2.4.11 release ...
> Is there some human-memory-loss-virus flooding the area ?
> Please stay serious.
I'm staying, please stay too.
And I was on this list _way_ before 2.4.11, 2.6 has, IMHO, a different story.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/