Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?

[Kendall Bennett]

Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What about specifically a module that includes the Linux Kernel's
> headers and uses its APIs? I don't think you could say that is
> definitely not a derivative work. 

You cannot copyright an API - people have been down that path before in 
the proprietry software community and have not succeeded. You can 
copyright the code in the header files, but does simply using the header 
files to build a program mean that the driver is now infected? If the 
header files include lots and lots of inline functions that ended up 
compiled into the code, then maybe.

Then again, it appears that most developers are using wrapped to avoid 
this situation, such that their private code does not include any Linux 
headers, only the GPL'ed wrapper.

So we go in circles again.

Regards,

---
Kendall Bennett
Chief Executive Officer
SciTech Software, Inc.
Phone: (530) 894 8400
http://www.scitechsoft.com

~ SciTech SNAP - The future of device driver technology! ~

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/