Re: State of devfs in 2.6?

[Jan Dittmer]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Greg KH wrote:
| On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:02:19AM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
|
|>>Regardless of the state of udev, devfs has insolvable problems and you
|>>should not use it.  End of story.
|>
|>how many bug reports did you see in the last three months of people
|>having problems with devfs?
|
|
| I don't think that all 4 users of devfs on 2.6 are all that vocal :)
| Either way, I haven't been paying attention, as I really don't care.
|

FWIW, I've been using devfs from the beginning of 2.4 and with 2.5/2.6
with Debian and never had a problem (knock on wood). I really like the
way of having device nodes only for present devices.
Btw. I still haven't figured out, how to use udev properly. I just get
the nodes of devices I plugin after boot and of the modules I load after
boot. IDE et all aren't showing up. How early do I need to load udev or
has my kernel to be all modular for it to work properly?

Thanks,

Jan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/1ZztLqMJRclVKIYRAlgWAJ0cFbRv2QbWrQbFNWACwHrp/opQiQCfZJVD
UjI7PkOYwt4auQb1qTRtwx8=
=40wq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/