Re: sensors vs 2.6

[Tomasz Torcz]

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:41:31AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> So obviously something didn't get built, and it looks like its the 
> winbond stuff.  The question is why?  Is there some method that can 
> be used to interrogate the kernel and determine if the stuff is 
> actually in there?

Maybe related: via sensors stuff is very picky about order of module
loading.
It does NOT work when i2c-dev, i2c-algo-bit and rest of sensors stuff
(isa bus, via modules) are built INTO kernel.
When everything is in modules, iw works ONLY when via modules are
modprobed _before_ anything using i2c.
Loading other i2c modules (bttv, lirc or sth else) before via modules
makes sensors unusable - there is no /sys/[...]/via directory,
or this directory is empty.

 
-- 
Tomasz Torcz                "Funeral in the morning, IDE hacking 
zdzichu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    in the afternoon and evening." - Alan Cox 
|> Playing: stream1.jungletrain.net:8000 ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/