Re: const versus __attribute__((const))

[Jamie Lokier]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Agreed.  It's just a bit ugly that the "m" in "rm" has a different 
> meaning than just "m".

Oh?  What does the "m" in "m,m" mean then?

(I don't have GCC 3.3 to try it here).

Sometimes that's useful, when used with differing multi-alternative
constraints on the other arguments, and 99% of the time you _do_ want
the "m,m" constraint to use the actual lvalue's address just like "m".

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/