Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [OOPS, usbcore, releaseintf] 2.6.0-test10-mm1

[Duncan Sands]

On Wednesday 10 December 2003 20:43, David Brownell wrote:
> Duncan Sands wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 December 2003 18:34, David Brownell wrote:
> >>>Unfortunately, usb_physical_reset_device calls usb_set_configuration
> >>>which takes dev->serialize.
> >>
> >>Not since late August it doesn't ...
> >
> > In current 2.5 bitkeeper it does.
>
> usb_physical_reset_device() does not call usb_set_configuration()
> except in the known-broken (for other reasons too!) "firmware changed"
> path.  Known-broken, but not yet removed since nobody has reported
> running into that or the other deadlock; the real fix is force
> re-enumeration of the device.

Still, it could be changed into a call to usb_physical_set_configuration
while we're waiting for a real fix, right?

Ciao,

Duncan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/