Re: [CFT][RFC] HT scheduler

[Kevin P. Fleming]

Nick Piggin wrote:

> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/w26/
> Against 2.6.0-test11
>
> This includes the SMT description for P4. Initial results shows comparable
> performance to Ingo's shared runqueue's patch on a dual P4 Xeon.

Is there any value in testing/using this on a single CPU P4-HT system, 
or is it only targeted at multi-CPU systems?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/