Re: Fixes for nforce2 hard lockup, apic, io-apic, udma133 covered

[Jamie Lokier]

Ross Dickson wrote:
> The v1 patch ((cpu_khz >> 12)+200) gave 700ns additional delay to
> your existing code path so I think I was being too optimistic in the
> initial v2 timing. I made the initial timing CPU freq dependent on
> the assumption that a faster cpu would get to the delay point
> quicker.

Maybe it scales with bus speed, not CPU internal speed?

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/