Re: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ??

[Chris Meadors]

On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:06, Balram Adlakha wrote:
> John Bradford (john@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> > I think we should consider introduce a policy of having .*beaver.*
> > names for each 2.6.x release, and maybe drop the version numbers
> > altogether during 2.7.
> >
> > John.
> 
> Sounds like a cool idea, but how are we supposed to know which "name"
> is newer?

The names could be chosen alphabetically.  Rooster was mentioned for
2.7, but since 2.6 is beaver, I propose cock, as 'c' follows 'b'.

-- 
Chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/