Re: Adaptec/DPT I2O Option Omitted From Linux 2.6.0 Kernel ConfigurationTool

[Samuel Flory]

Leon Toh wrote:
>  At 11:15 AM 29/12/2003, Samuel Flory wrote:
>
>
> How broken is the driver than ? What are the implication's if the driver 
> is left as it is for now ?

  It doesn't compile at all.  If it's not fixed your only other option 
is the generic i2o driver.

> > It doesn't even compile in 2.4 for a number of archs like amd64.
>
>
> This driver was initially intended only for i386 arch. Furthermore at 
> that time when this driver was finalized amd64 wasn't available.

  My point is that the driver isn't very portable.

> >   A while back  a bunch of people (including myself) raised the 
> > concern through various channels with adaptec.  In theroy someone at 
> > adaptec is working on it, but there was not an ETA.
>
>
> If you have happen to have a list of issues with this current driver 
> together with supporting information to back up those claims, please 
> forward them to so that I can escalate those issues into Adaptec via the 
> appropriate communication channel. I happen to have a number of 
> contact's within Adaptec myself.
>
> By the way I've hack the script file to make Adaptec I2O Option to 
> appear in Linux 2.6.0 Kernel Configuration tool. Currently I'm now in 
> the middle of recompiling the kernel using current dpti2o driver support 
> but haven't got to the dpti2o driver yet.

  You might want to hold off on doing a lot of work for a bit.  I think 
there was a beta driver that was being passed around.

--
There is no such thing as obsolete hardware.
Merely hardware that other people don't want.
(The Second Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory  <sflory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/