Re: 2.6.0 performance problems

[Martin Schlemmer]

On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 01:05, Thomas Molina wrote:

> Sorry.  One other bit of data from 2.6:
> 
> [root@lap bitkeeper]# hdparm -i /dev/hda
> 
> /dev/hda:
> 
>  Model=IBM-DJSA-220, FwRev=JS4OAC3A, SerialNo=44V44FT3300
>  Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
>  RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
>  BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=1874kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
>  CurCHS=17475/15/63, CurSects=16513875, LBA=yes, LBAsects=39070080
>  IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
>  PIO modes:  pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
>  DMA modes:  mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
>  UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4
>  AdvancedPM=yes: mode=0x80 (128) WriteCache=enabled
>  Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-5 T13 1321D revision 1:
> 
>  * signifies the current active mode

Any reason it is currently set to udma2 where it support udma4 ?


-- 
Martin Schlemmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part