Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0 batch scheduling, HT aware

[bill davidsen]

In article <3FED4838.6050908@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mika_Penttil=E4?=  <mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| heh...and the situation gets even worse when you add cpus, with 16way 
| you get only 1/16 of the speed ;)

No, not when you add CPUs, when you add siblings. There's a big
difference, since sibs compete for cache on the chip, and some execution
units (FPU?).
-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/