Re: CPRM ?? Re: Possibly wrong BIO usage in ide_multwrite

From: Jens Axboe
Date: Fri Jan 02 2004 - 06:31:39 EST


On Thu, Jan 01 2004, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> Christophe,
>
> I am sorry but adding in a splitter to CPRM is not acceptable.
> Digital Rights Management in the kernel is not acceptable to me, period.
>
> Maybe I have misread your intent and the contents on your website.
>
> Device-Mappers are one thing, intercepting buffers in the taskfile FSM
> transport is another. This stinks of CPRM at this level, regardless of
> your intent. Do correct me if I am wrong.

0 2 4 6 8 10
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
PARANOIA-METER

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/