Re: Suspected bug in fs/ufs/inode.c - test for < 0 on unsigned sector_t - [2.6.1-rc1-mm1]

[Tim Cambrant]

On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 11:45:56PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> 
> Is this analysis correct?  If it is, can the code simply be removed?

It does seem odd, but indeed, a confirmation from someone with authority
would be nice before digging in to a cleanup-process like this. Try e-mailing
the maintainer of the code directly, since it doesn't seem like anyone
feels like wasting any time on this :)

Nice job on the discovery though, if this is true, these things really should
be removed.

-- 
Tim Cambrant <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
GPG KeyID 0x59518702
Fingerprint: 14FE 03AE C2D1 072A 87D0  BC4D FA9E 02D8 5951 8702

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature